Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40284785›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2025

The Clinical Validity and Utility of PCR Compared to Conventional Culture and Sensitivity Testing for the Management of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Adults: A Secondary (Ad Hoc) Analysis of Pathogen Detection, Resistance Profiles, and Impact on Clinical Outcomes.

Moustafa Kardjadj, Tara W Chang, Roel Chavez, DeAndre Derrick, Frank L Spangler, Itoe P Priestly, Lauren Y Park, Thomas K Huard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Moustafa Kardjadjdicentra, Toronto, ON M4W 3E2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9537-2274
Tara W ChangAlbany Urology Clinic & Surgery Center, Albany, GA 31707, USA.
Roel ChavezDoc Lab Inc., Hillsboro, OR 97006, USA.
DeAndre DerrickDoc Lab Inc., Hillsboro, OR 97006, USA.
Frank L SpanglerSoft Cell Laboratories, St. George, UT 84770, USA.
Itoe P PriestlySoft Cell Laboratories, St. George, UT 84770, USA.
Lauren Y Parkdicentra, Toronto, ON M4W 3E2, Canada.
Thomas K HuardMED-US Consulting, LLC., Austin, TX 78734, USA.

Funding

Doc Lab inc Doc lab inc funded this study
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical success in treating complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) depends on accurate pathogen detection, given the common occurrence of polymicrobial infections and antimicrobial resistance. This multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded study compared polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostics to conventional culture and sensitivity (C&S) testing in guiding the treatment of cUTIs. PCR identified polymicrobial infections in 43.52% of cases, a significantly higher rate than that observed with C&S (31.95%,

Indexed as

antimicrobial drug resistancemicrobial sensitivity testsmolecular diagnostic testingpatient-relevant outcomepolymerase chain reactionpolymicrobial infectionsurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID40284785
PMCPMC12029264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.