Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40284772›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2025

Metataxonomics Characterization of Soil Microbiome Extraction Method Using Different Dispersant Solutions.

David Madariaga-Troncoso, Isaac Vargas, Dorian Rojas-Villalta, Michel Abanto, Kattia Núñez-Montero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David Madariaga-TroncosoFacultad de Ciencias de La Salud, Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4810101, Chile.
Isaac VargasEscuela de Biología, Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica, Cartago 30101, Costa Rica.
Dorian Rojas-VillaltaCellular and Molecular Biology Research Center, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José 11501, Costa Rica.ORCID 0000-0002-2939-1485
Michel AbantoNúcleo Científico y Tecnológico en Biorecursos (BIOREN), Universidad de La Frontera, Avenida Francisco Salazar, Temuco 4811230, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-9136-0041
Kattia Núñez-MonteroFacultad de Ciencias de La Salud, Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4810101, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-8629-5107

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo de Chile ANID Anillo ATE230007Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo de Chile Fondecyt Iniciación 11230475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil health is essential for maintaining ecosystem balance, food security, and human well-being. Anthropogenic activities, such as climate change and excessive agrochemical use, have led to the degradation of soil ecosystems worldwide. Microbiome transplantation has emerged as a promising approach for restoring perturbed soils; however, direct soil transfer presents practical limitations for large-scale applications. An alternative strategy involves extracting microbial communities through soil washing processes, but its success highly depends on proper microbiota characterization and efficient extraction methods. This study evaluated a soil wash method using four different dispersant solutions (Tween-80, NaCl, sodium citrate, and sodium pyrophosphate) for their ability to extract the majority of microbial cells from Antarctic and Crop soils. The extracted microbiomes were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene metataxonomics to assess their diversity and abundance. We found that some treatments extracted a greater proportion of specific taxa, and, on the other hand, some extracted a lower proportion than the control treatment. In addition, these dispersant solutions showed the extraction of the relevant microbial community profile in soil samples, composed of multiple taxa, including beneficial bacteria for soil health. Our study aims to optimize DNA extraction methods for microbiome analyses and to explore the use of this technique in various biotechnological applications. The results provide insights into the effect of dispersant solutions on microbiome extractions. In this regard, sodium chloride could be optimal for Antarctic soils, while sodium citrate is suggested for the Crop soils.

Indexed as

16S rRNA gene metataxonomicsdispersant solutionsmetabarcodingmetataxonomicsmicrobiome transplantationsoil bioremediation

Identifiers

PMID40284772
PMCPMC12029719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.