ArticleMicroorganisms2025
Metataxonomics Characterization of Soil Microbiome Extraction Method Using Different Dispersant Solutions.
Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil health is essential for maintaining ecosystem balance, food security, and human well-being. Anthropogenic activities, such as climate change and excessive agrochemical use, have led to the degradation of soil ecosystems worldwide. Microbiome transplantation has emerged as a promising approach for restoring perturbed soils; however, direct soil transfer presents practical limitations for large-scale applications. An alternative strategy involves extracting microbial communities through soil washing processes, but its success highly depends on proper microbiota characterization and efficient extraction methods. This study evaluated a soil wash method using four different dispersant solutions (Tween-80, NaCl, sodium citrate, and sodium pyrophosphate) for their ability to extract the majority of microbial cells from Antarctic and Crop soils. The extracted microbiomes were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene metataxonomics to assess their diversity and abundance. We found that some treatments extracted a greater proportion of specific taxa, and, on the other hand, some extracted a lower proportion than the control treatment. In addition, these dispersant solutions showed the extraction of the relevant microbial community profile in soil samples, composed of multiple taxa, including beneficial bacteria for soil health. Our study aims to optimize DNA extraction methods for microbiome analyses and to explore the use of this technique in various biotechnological applications. The results provide insights into the effect of dispersant solutions on microbiome extractions. In this regard, sodium chloride could be optimal for Antarctic soils, while sodium citrate is suggested for the Crop soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.