Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40284764›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2025

Intra- and Post-Operative Bacteriological Surveys of Surgical Site in Horses: A Single-Centre Study.

Anna Cerullo, Matteo Riccardo Di Nicola, Nicola Scilimati, Alice Bertoletti, Giuseppe Pollicino, Barbara Moroni, Marco Pepe, Sara Nannarone, Rodolfo Gialletti, Fabrizio Passamonti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna CerulloIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d'Aosta, Via Bologna 148, 10154 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4804-3870
Matteo Riccardo Di NicolaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d'Aosta, Via Bologna 148, 10154 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7199-0804
Nicola ScilimatiDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Strada del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9234-3478
Alice BertolettiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Sport Horse Research Centre, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8736-9924
Giuseppe PollicinoAniCura Istituto Veterinario Novara, Strada Provinciale 9, Granozzo con Monticello, 28060 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-4297-8107
Barbara MoroniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d'Aosta, Via Bologna 148, 10154 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1478-8436
Marco PepeDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Sport Horse Research Centre, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9141-0536
Sara NannaroneDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Sport Horse Research Centre, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7774-9920
Rodolfo GiallettiDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Strada del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Fabrizio PassamontiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Sport Horse Research Centre, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8773-838X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial contamination of the surgical site in horses is a major risk factor for the development of surgical site infections (SSIs), which increase morbidity, mortality, the hospitalisation period, antibiotic use, and management costs. While contamination is a prerequisite for infection, its progression to clinical infection depends on additional factors that compromise host defences. The present study, conducted at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the University of Perugia over an 11-month period, investigated bacterial contamination in 70 surgeries (53 clean and 17 clean-contaminated) at the end of the procedure. To exclude pre-existing contamination, a sterile swab was collected after surgical scrub, and only cases that entered surgery with a sterile operative field were considered. A swab, biopsy, and fine-needle aspiration from the wound margins were then performed at the end of the surgery to conduct a qualitative assessment of the bacterial contamination of the surgical sites. Risk factors for surgical field contamination were analysed separately for clean and clean-contaminated procedures. Specifically, for clean-contaminated surgeries, the presence of emergency conditions, surgery duration, and intra-operative complications were evaluated. For clean surgeries, risk factors included the type of operating room, surgical duration, tissue involved, use of local anaesthetics, and placement of surgical drapes. The results revealed bacterial contamination rates of 49.1% in clean surgeries and 41.2% in clean-contaminated surgeries. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most frequently isolated bacteria, followed by

Indexed as

bacterial contaminationequine surgeryprophylactic measuressurgical site infectionveterinary bacteriology

Identifiers

PMID40284764
PMCPMC12029434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.