ArticlePolymers2025
Enhancing Mechanical Energy Absorption of Honeycomb and Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Lattice Structures Produced by Fused Deposition Modelling in Reusable Polymers.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Additively Manufactured Polymeric Structures for Mechanical Energy Absorption.Polymers · 2026Review
- Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses: A Review on Structure-Directing-Based Synthesis, Characterization, and Biomedical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Metamortar Composites Reinforced with Re-Entrant Auxetic Cells: Mechanical Performance and Enhanced Energy Absorption.Polymers · 2025Article
- Reusable 3D-Printed Thermoplastic Polyurethane Honeycombs for Mechanical Energy Absorption.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the mechanical energy absorption properties of polymeric lattice structures fabricated using additive manufacturing. Existing studies have primarily focused on rigid or single-use materials, with limited attention given to flexible polymers and their behaviour under repeated compressive loading. Addressing this gap, the structures investigated in this study are manufactured using three flexible polymers-polyether block amide, thermoplastic polyurethane, and thermoplastic copolyester elastomer-to enhance the reusability performance. Two high-performance designs were analysed, namely honeycomb structures (inspired by pomelo peel and simply hexagonal arrangements) and 3D triply periodic minimal surface structure of the type FRD. The primary objective was to evaluate their energy absorption capacity and reusability using three repeated compression tests. These tests revealed that thermoplastic copolyester elastomer exhibited the highest energy absorption in initial impact conditions, but lower values for the following compressions. However, polyether block amide demonstrated superior reusability, maintaining a consistent energy absorption efficiency of 56.1% over multiple compression cycles. The study confirms that modifying triply periodic minimal surface structures along the z-axis enhances their absorption efficiency, with even-numbered z-parameter structures outperforming odd-numbered ones due to their complete cell structure. These findings highlight the critical role of structural geometry and material selection to optimise polymeric lattice structures for lightweight reusable energy absorption applications, such as automotive safety and impact protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.