ReviewPolymers2025
Biomaterial-Based Additive Manufactured Composite/Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanobiology-Driven Metabolic Reprogramming: Integrative Roles of YAP/TAZ Signaling and Extracellular Matrix Dynamics.Cell biology international · 2026Review
- Biological Interactions in Rat Tibial Osteogenesis: Micro-CT, Histomorphometric, and Histological Analyses of Bioglass, Fibrin Biopolymer, and Photobiomodulation.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Collagen Scaffolds in Regenerative Endodontic Procedures: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Perspectives.Polymers · 2026Review
- Innovative prospects in 3D printed bio-scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering: A systematic review.World journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Transforming therapeutics through biomaterials: A comprehensive insight into biomaterials' role in effective drug delivery and healthcare advancement.Biomaterials translational · 2026Review
- Biomimetic Scaffolds and Extracellular Matrix-Based Strategies for Myofiber Regeneration in Volumetric Muscle Loss.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Three-dimensional bioprinted hydrogels for the management of diabetic wounds: A review.BioImpacts : BI · 2026Review
- Bioengineered Tricomposite Hydrogel Enhances Chondrogenic Phenotype and Hyaline Matrix Formation in Human Chondrocytes.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancements in Chitosan and Cellulose Nanoparticles for Stem Cell-Based Tissue Engineering.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Review
- Wound Healing: Molecular Mechanisms, Antimicrobial Peptides, and Emerging Technologies in Regenerative Medicine.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating Additive and Traditional Manufacturing for Multiscale Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Sandwich-Layered Structure Nanofiber Conduits Facilitating the Repair of Long-Gap Nerve Defects.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM), also referred to as three-dimensional printing/printed (3DP), has emerged as a transformative approach in the current design and manufacturing of various biomaterials for the restoration of damaged tissues inside the body. This advancement has greatly aided the development of customized biomedical devices including implants, prosthetics, and orthotics that are specific to the patients. In tissue engineering (TE), AM enables the fabrication of complex structures that promote desirable cellular responses in the regeneration of tissues. Since the choice of biomaterials plays a vital role in scaffold performance as well as cellular responses, meticulous material selection is essential in optimizing the functionality of scaffolds. These scaffolds often possess certain characteristics such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, biomimicry, and porous structure. To this end, polymers such as chitosan, collagen, alginate, hyaluronic acid, polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid, and polycaprolactone have been extensively investigated in the fabrication of tissue-engineered scaffolds. Furthermore, combinations of biomaterials are also utilized to further enhance the scaffolds' performance and functionality. This review discusses the principle of AM and explores recent advancements in AM technologies in the development of TE and regenerative medicine. In addition, the applications of 3DP, polymer-based scaffolds will be highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.