ArticlePolymers2025
Characterization of Material Extrusion-Printed Amorphous Poly(Ether Ketone Ketone) (PEKK) Parts.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poly(ether ketone ketone) (PEKK), as a representative of high-performance poly(aryl ether ketones), shows outstanding thermomechanical properties, opening up a huge range of different applications in various technical fields. Its appearance as a quasi-amorphous polymer with a certain suppression of the crystallization process facilitates melt processing via additive manufacturing processes like material extrusion (MEX), especially in fused filament fabrication (FFF). The quality of the printing process is proven in this work by tensile testing and surface roughness measurements of suitable specimens. The MEX printing of semicrystalline PEKK faces two major challenges: on the one hand, the very high printing temperature is in contrast to established engineering plastics, and on the other hand, it is difficult to avoid crystallization after printing. The first issue can be addressed by using suitably enhanced MEX printers and the second one by selecting adapted printing parameters. The measured Young's modulus (3.49 GPa) and tensile strength (104 MPa) values are higher than the related vendors' data given for filaments (3.0 GPa and 92 MPa, respectively). In addition, the temperature-dependent thermal conductivity is determined, and the values of well-established PEEK (poly(ether ether ketone)) in the temperature range from 20 to 180 °C are mostly slightly higher in comparison to the related PEKK data. Based on the results, PEKK can be a useful substitute for well-established PEEK because of their comparable properties. However, PEKK has a pronouncedly lower FFF printing temperature, combined with a reduced tendency of the device to warp after printing. A larger printed test part with some surface structures shows the improved printability of PEKK in comparison to PEEK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.