ReviewPolymers2025
Porogenic Solvents in Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Synthesis: A Comprehensive Review of Current Practices and Emerging Trends.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for Biosensing: From Synthetic Recognition to Integrated Biointerfaces.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Review
- Systematic Design of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for Triclosan Using Design of Experiments and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.Polymers · 2026Article
- Crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier with Molecularly Imprinted Polymeric Nanocarriers: An Emerging Frontier in Brain Disease Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Development of molecularly imprinted polymers for the removal of levofloxacin.BMC chemistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Small Toxic Molecule Detection and Elimination Using Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs).Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The versatility of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) has led to their integration into applications like biosensing, separation, environmental monitoring, and drug delivery technologies. This diversity of applications has resulted in a plethora of synthesis approaches to precisely tailor the materials' properties to the specific demands. A critical, yet often overlooked, factor in MIP synthesis is the choice of porogen. Porogens play a pivotal role in defining the morphology, surface properties, swelling behavior, and binding efficiencies of the resulting MIPs. While aprotic solvents have traditionally been the standard in molecular imprinting, recent developments have expanded the variety of employed porogens accompanied by notable improvements in MIP performance. Therefore, this review aims to highlight both traditional and emerging types of porogens used in molecular imprinting, their influence on polymer properties and sorption performance, and their application across various sensing and extraction applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.