ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Disparities in Utilization of the World Trade Center Health Program Among World Trade Center Rescue and Recovery Workers and Volunteers.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Overcoming social determinants: World trade center health program monitoring use among the general responders.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 11 September 2001 World Trade Center (WTC) rescue and recovery workers (RRWs) included first responders (FDNY and NYPD), volunteers, and other workers. Volunteers were often more vulnerable than first responders to adverse health outcomes resulting from the exposure. It is not yet known whether there are differences in WTC Health Program (WTCHP) utilization by worker type. This is a cross-sectional study of 20,012 WTCHP-eligible RRWs to examine whether worker type was associated with WTCHP utilization based on self-reported data from four WTC Health Registry follow-up surveys (2006-2021), using multivariable log-binomial regression adjusted for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities. We also examined factors associated with WTCHP utilization by worker type. Overall, 9584 RRWs (47.9%) reported receiving WTCHP services, but only 22.5% of volunteers reported WTCHP utilization. After adjustment, first responders and other workers were, respectively, 2.73 (95% CI = 2.56, 2.92) and 1.69 (95% CI = 1.58, 1.80) times more likely to utilize WTCHP service than volunteers. Sociodemographic factors and comorbidities were consistently associated with WTCHP utilization across worker types, except for race/ethnicity. Among those eligible, the volunteer group reported the lowest utilization of WTCHP among worker types, suggesting that WTC volunteers should be a priority group for outreach regarding access and utilization of WTCHP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.