ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Subjective Outcome Evaluation of a Positive Youth Development Program in Mainland China: Evidence in the Post-Pandemic Era.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping item-level dynamics of positive youth development in Chinese adolescents: A four-wave cross-lagged panel network study.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2026Article
- Parental Marital Satisfaction and Suicidal Behavior in Preadolescents and Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Positive Youth Development Attributes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Subjective outcome evaluation of a gifted education program: the Project GIFT in Hong Kong.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties of the Chinese Responsibility Scale in university students in Hong Kong, China.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Subjective Outcome Evaluation of a Positive Youth Development Program in Mainland China: Evidence in the Post-Pandemic Era.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- How Coparenting Is Linked to Depression among Chinese Young Girls and Boys: Evidence from a Network Analysis.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- National Security Law Education in Hong Kong: Qualitative Evaluation Based on the Perspective of the Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Subjective Outcome Evaluation of Instructional Videos in Leadership Education.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Materialism, Egocentrism and Delinquent Behavior in Chinese Adolescents in Mainland China: A Short-Term Longitudinal Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Offline Victimization, Psychological Morbidity, and Problematic Online Behavior among Chinese Secondary School Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Serving Children and Adolescents in Need during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluation of Service-Learning Subjects with and without Face-to-Face Interaction.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOptimizing the development of adolescents in the post-pandemic era is an urgent concern. As an active initiative, the "Tin Ka Ping P.A.T.H.S. Project", rooted in the "Positive Youth Development (PYD)" approach, represents a curriculum-based program aimed at fostering the psychosocial competence and well-being of adolescents. This study presents evaluation findings of the program's effectiveness during the 2022-2023 academic year.
methodsUsing a validated "36-item Subjective Outcome Evaluation scale (SOES)", we evaluated perceptions of 2165 junior students (M
resultsReplicating our previous findings before and during the pandemic, the 36-item SOES exhibited satisfactory validity and reliability in the current study. Students commonly provided favorable evaluations regarding program quality, implementer quality, and perceived benefits. Senior-grade students were more likely to perceive the program more positively.
conclusionsThese replications underscore the generalizability of the robustness of the 36-item SOES as a reliable evaluation measurement tool across different time periods and research backgrounds. The participants' positive responses indicated the positive impact of the "Tin Ka Ping P.A.T.H.S. Project" in enhancing the psychosocial competence and well-being of the students across background contexts and time periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.