SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Second-Hand Smoke Exposure and Risk of Lung Cancer Among Nonsmokers in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of Local Comprehensive Smoke-Free Ordinances With Cancer Incidence Trends in Louisiana.Preventing chronic disease · 2026Article
- Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers: Risk Factors, Driver Mutations, and Therapeutic Advances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Beyond tobacco: understanding the growing burden of lung adenocarcinoma in women.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to explore the link between exposure to tobacco smoke among nonsmokers and the risk of lung cancer in the United States. We searched six databases for studies on second-hand smoke (SHS) and lung cancer following PRISMA guidelines. Following the random effects model and specific statistical methods, our meta-analysis analyzed studies based on SHS exposure type. A total of 19 eligible studies were included in the review and 15 in the meta-analysis. We covered exposure from parents (childhood), spouses and partners (household), and work-related exposure (colleagues), with higher risk among non-smoking children and domestic partners. Findings reveal a consistent link between SHS exposure and increased lung cancer risk for this population (exposure effect sizes: 1.05-3.11). Analysis of childhood SHS exposure reveals a distinct increased risk associated with parental exposure. For nonsmokers living with smoking spouses, there is a marked 41% increase in risk. Higher risk was associated with more and more prolonged SHS exposure. Exposure to SHS in the workplace shows a correlation with lung cancer risk. Our findings highlight increased SHS-related lung cancer risk, particularly among non-smoking children and domestic partners, intensifying with the amount and duration of exposure, indicating the significant impact of SHS within domestic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.