Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40283787›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Predictive Modeling for Pandemic Forecasting: A COVID-19 Study in New Zealand and Partner Countries.

Oras Baker, Zahra Ziran, Massimo Mecella, Kasthuri Subaramaniam, Sellappan Palaniappan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oras BakerFaculty of Computing and Emerging Technology, Ravensbourne University London, London SE10 0EW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0958-4861
Zahra ZiranDepartment of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Ariosto 25, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3529-7380
Massimo MecellaDepartment of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Ariosto 25, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9730-8882
Kasthuri SubaramaniamDepartment of Decision Science, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0704-923X
Sellappan PalaniappanFaculty of Computing, Help University, Bukit Damansara, Kuala Lumpur 50490, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0009-1168-2864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes a data-driven approach to leveraging large-scale COVID-19 datasets to enhance the predictive modeling of disease spread in the early stages. We systematically evaluate three machine learning models-ARIMA, Prophet, and LSTM-using a comprehensive framework that incorporates time-series analysis, multivariate data integration, and a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) technique to assess model performance. The study focuses on key features such as daily confirmed cases, geographic variations, and temporal trends, while considering data constraints and adaptability across different scenarios. Our findings reveal that LSTM and ARIMA consistently outperform Prophet, with LSTM achieving the highest predictive accuracy in most cases, particularly when trained on 20-week datasets. ARIMA, however, demonstrates superior stability and reliability across varying time frames, making it a robust choice for short-term forecasting. A direct comparative analysis with existing approaches highlights the strengths and limitations of each model, emphasizing the importance of region-specific data characteristics and training periods. The proposed methodology not only identifies optimal predictive strategies but also establishes a foundation for automating predictive analysis, enabling timely and data-driven decision-making for disease control and prevention. This research is validated using data from New Zealand and its major trading partners-China, Australia, the United States, Japan, and Germany-demonstrating its applicability across diverse contexts. The results contribute to the development of adaptive forecasting frameworks that can empower public health authorities to respond proactively to emerging health threats.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsForecastingHumansMachine LearningNew ZealandSARS-CoV-2COVID-19disease forecastingmachine learningpublic healthtime series analysis

Identifiers

PMID40283787
PMCPMC12026713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.