Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40283780›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Perspectives on an Intensive Hospital-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention in Relation to Transurethral Resection of the Bladder Tumour (TURBT): Interviews with Patients, Relatives, and Clinicians.

Line Noes Lydom, Rie Raffing, Susanne Vahr Lauridsen, Ingrid Egerod, Ulla Nordström Joensen, Hanne Tønnesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Line Noes LydomWHO-CC/Clinical Health Promotion Centre, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9431-9984
Rie RaffingWHO-CC/Clinical Health Promotion Centre, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Susanne Vahr LauridsenWHO-CC/Clinical Health Promotion Centre, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6045-4723
Ingrid EgerodDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2000 København N, Denmark.
Ulla Nordström JoensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2000 København N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5400-4531
Hanne TønnesenWHO-CC/Clinical Health Promotion Centre, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7161-3416

Funding

Danish Cancer Society R223-A13094Novo Nordic Foundation NNF19OC0058924Oak Foundation OFIL-24-074Sygeforsikringen Danmark 2021-0304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoking is a major risk factor for bladder cancer and postoperative complications. Therefore, urological guidelines strongly recommend smoking cessation. Notwithstanding, many patients continue to smoke beyond the time of diagnosis. By using the qualitative methodology, this study aimed to explore barriers, facilitators, and recommendations related to the intensive smoking cessation Gold Standard Programme (GSP) from the multi-perspective view of patients treated with transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT), their relatives, and clinicians. We conducted semi-structured individual interviews with eight patients, four relatives, and six clinicians in the urology setting. Data were analysed using the Framework Method. All participants perceived the GSP positively. Across the three groups, five categories emerged describing barriers and facilitators: perceptions of the GSP, pragmatic factors, health-related factors, psychological factors, and relational and communicative factors. Similarly, recommendations were represented in two categories: the GSP and pragmatic factors. While facilitators were relatively similar across the three groups, barriers were dissimilar or contradictory. The clinicians expressed the most challenges related to relational and communicative factors. The patients mainly had recommendations related to the GSP, while the clinicians' recommendations focused on pragmatic factors for conducting the GSP. The potential involvement of relatives needs to be further investigated.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdultAgedFamilyFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchbladder cancerGSPmulti-perspective interviewssmoking cessation interventiontransurethral resection of bladder tumoursTURBT

Identifiers

PMID40283780
PMCPMC12026795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.