Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40283593›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Computer-Assisted Navigation in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.

Marina Marescalchi, Alessandro El Motassime, Luca Andriollo, Alberto Polizzi, Giuseppe Niccoli, Vincenzo Morea

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marina MarescalchiOrtopedia e Traumatologia, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-0252-0729
Alessandro El MotassimeOrtopedia e Traumatologia, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-8331-0826
Luca AndriolloOrtopedia e Traumatologia, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-1586-2542
Alberto PolizziOrtopedia e Traumatologia, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8550-1001
Giuseppe NiccoliOrtopedia e Traumatologia, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3660-9523
Vincenzo MoreaOrtopedia e Traumatologia, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shoulder arthroplasty, including total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), is a well-established procedure for treating degenerative, post-traumatic, and inflammatory conditions of the shoulder joint. The success of these surgeries depends largely on the precise placement of implants, which helps restore proper joint mechanics, reduce complications, and extend the lifespan of the prosthesis. However, achieving accurate implant positioning can be challenging, especially in cases involving severe bone loss, anatomical deformities, or prior surgeries. Poor alignment can lead to instability, implant loosening, and the need for revision surgery. Computer-assisted navigation has become an important tool in shoulder arthroplasty, providing real-time intraoperative guidance to improve surgical accuracy and consistency. By integrating preoperative 3D imaging with intraoperative tracking, navigation technology allows surgeons to optimize glenoid component placement, reducing the risk of malalignment and mechanical failure. Research suggests that navigation-assisted techniques improve precision, enhance functional outcomes, and may even reduce complication rates by optimizing fixation strategies, such as using fewer but longer screws in RSA. Despite its benefits, navigation in shoulder arthroplasty is not without challenges. It requires additional surgical time, increases costs, and demands a learning curve for surgeons. However, with advancements in artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and robotic-assisted surgery, navigation is expected to become even more effective and accessible. This review explores the current impact of navigation on clinical outcomes, its role in complex cases, and the future potential of this technology. While early results are promising, further long-term studies are needed to fully assess its value and establish best practices for its routine use in shoulder arthroplasty.

Indexed as

computer-assisted navigationGPS navigationreverse shoulder arthroplastyshoulder osteoarthritisshoulder replacement

Identifiers

PMID40283593
PMCPMC12027880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.