Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40283521›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Aortic Stenosis: Time for a Sex-Based Approach?

Aurelia Zimmerli, Quentin Liabot, Georgios Tzimas, Mariama Akodad, Adil Salihu, Victor Weerts, Panagiotis Antiochos, Stephanie L Sellers, Pierre Monney, Olivier Muller and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aurelia ZimmerliService of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Quentin LiabotService of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0005-6529-1181
Georgios TzimasService of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2810-8887
Mariama AkodadInstitut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud (ICPS), Hôpital Jacques Cartier, Ramsay-Santé, 91300 Massy, France.
Adil SalihuService of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Victor WeertsService of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0007-8522-284X
Panagiotis AntiochosService of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8466-7360
Stephanie L SellersDilawri Cardiovascular Institute, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Pierre MonneyService of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3083-7333
Olivier MullerService of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stephane FournierService of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
David MeierService of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5524-5844

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive form of valvular heart disease most commonly associated with aging, with an exponential increase in prevalence after age 50. While men have historically been considered at higher risk, recent studies highlight a similar prevalence between men and women, with a higher prevalence in elderly women driven by longer life expectancy. Sex-related differences in clinical presentation, anatomy, and pathophysiology influence disease progression, severity assessment, and management. Women are often diagnosed at more advanced stages, exhibiting more pronounced symptoms, typically dyspnea and functional impairment, whereas men more often report chest pain. Women have a smaller body surface area, leading to smaller aortic annuli, left ventricular outflow tracts, aortic roots impacting flow dynamic, and severity grading. Diagnostic challenge contributes to the undertreatment of women. Despite experiencing severe AS, women receive fewer interventions and face delays in treatment. The advent of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) improved outcomes, with studies suggesting a potential advantage in women compared to men. However, the anatomical differences, such as smaller annuli and more tortuous vascular access, necessitate tailored procedural approaches. Recognizing these sex-specific differences is essential to optimizing AS management, ensuring timely interventions, and improving patient outcomes. Future strategies should incorporate sex-specific thresholds for diagnosis and treatment while leveraging technological advancements, such as artificial intelligence, for personalized therapeutic decisions.

Indexed as

aortic stenosispathophysiologysex-specificTAVIwomen

Identifiers

PMID40283521
PMCPMC12028251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.