Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40283511›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

The Role of Megakaryocyte Assessment in Bone Marrow Cytology.

Monika Błocka-Gumowska, Iwona Hus, Agnieszka Szymczyk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monika Błocka-GumowskaLaboratory Diagnostics Centre, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Wołoska 137 Str., 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Iwona HusDepartment of Hematology, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Wołoska 137 Str., 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka SzymczykDepartment of Hematology, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Wołoska 137 Str., 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8347-7557

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the progress made in recent years in hematological diagnostics, cytological assessment of bone marrow, including the assessment of megakaryocytes, is still an important element of the diagnostic process. It is one of the most accurate methods for detecting even minor abnormalities, which is often superior to histopathological examination in this respect. Although, according to current recommendations, megakaryocytes are not included in the total percentage formula of the myelogram, the assessment of platelet function, morphological features, and quantitative disorders allows for the direction of further diagnostic process. In this article, we present the principles of assessing megakaryocytes in a bone marrow aspirate smear. We also characterize normal megakaryocytes at various stages of megakaryopoiesis, atypical megakaryocytes in pathological and physiological conditions, and cells with a similar morphology to megakaryocytes.

Indexed as

bone marrow cytologydysmegakaryopoiesismegakaryocytemegakaryopoiesis

Identifiers

PMID40283511
PMCPMC12027952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.