Positive Lymph Nodes Independently Affect Long-Term Survival After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Non-Ampullary Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its subtypes: clinical relevance of histopathology and molecular characterization, integrating the key updates of the 2026 WHO classification.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
   Review
2. Isolated extreme gamma-glutamyl transferase elevation as an early indicator of ampullary adenocarcinoma in a young adult: a case report with molecular insights.BMC gastroenterology · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as