ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
The Furosemide Stress Test: A Dynamic Tool for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury Progression in Critical Care Medicine.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between the Modified Furosemide Response Index and Prognosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on the MIMIC-IV Database.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2026Article
- Elevated triglyceride-glucose index and acute kidney injury risk in critical atrial fibrillation: an analysis from MIMIC-IV.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) remains a significant challenge in critical care medicine, affecting up to 50% of intensive care unit patients with substantial mortality rates. While traditional approaches to AKI assessment rely on static measurements like serum creatinine and urine output, the furosemide stress test (FST) has emerged as a dynamic functional tool for evaluating renal tubular function and predicting AKI progression. This comprehensive review examines the historical development, physiological basis, technical aspects, and clinical applications of FST in various patient populations. Originally developed and validated in 2013, FST has demonstrated superior predictive capabilities for AKI progression and the need for renal replacement therapy compared to conventional biomarkers. The test's mechanism relies on assessing the kidney's response to a standardized furosemide challenge, providing insights into both the structural integrity and functional reserve of the renal tubular system. Standardized protocols have been established for different clinical scenarios, though implementation challenges remain, including timing considerations, patient selection, and resource requirements. FST has shown utility in critical care, post-cardiac surgery, sepsis-associated AKI, and heart failure settings. Recent developments include integration with artificial intelligence, personalized medicine approaches, and combination with novel biomarkers. While limitations exist, including contraindications and technical challenges, ongoing research continues to refine protocols and expand applications. This review highlights FST's role as a valuable prognostic tool in modern AKI management and discusses future directions, including automated monitoring systems, protocol standardization efforts, and potential applications in different patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.