Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40283412›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Improving Outcomes in Survivors of Sepsis-The Transition from Secondary to Primary Care, and the Role of Primary Care: A Narrative Review.

Rosie Taylor, Sarah Vollam, Stuart R McKechnie, Akshay Shah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rosie TaylorOxford Critical Care, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-5496-6815
Sarah VollamNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Stuart R McKechnieOxford Critical Care, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9312-0789
Akshay ShahNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1869-2231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. The number of patients with sepsis requiring critical care admission is increasing. At the same time, overall mortality from sepsis is declining. With increasing survival to hospital discharge, there are an increasing number of sepsis survivors whose care needs shift from the acute to chronic care settings. Recently, the phrase "post-sepsis syndrome" has emerged to encompass the myriad of complications in patients recovering from sepsis. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a contemporary summary of the available literature on post-sepsis care and highlight areas of ongoing research. There are many incentives for improving the quality of survivorship following sepsis, including individual health-related outcomes (e.g., increased survival, enhanced physical and psychological health) and wider socio-economic benefits (e.g., reduced economic burden on the healthcare systems, reduced physical and psychological burden on carers, ability for individuals (and carers) to return to workforce). Modifiable factors influencing long-term outcomes can be in-hospital or after discharge, when primary care physicians play a pivotal role. Despite national and international guidance being available, this area has been under-recognised historically, despite its profoundly negative impact on both patients and their families or caregivers. Contributing factors likely include the lack of a formally recognised "disease" or pathology, the presence of challenging-to-treat symptoms such as fatigue, weakness and cognitive impairment, and the prevailing assumption that ongoing rehabilitation merely requires time. Our review will focus on the following areas: screening for new cognitive and physical impairments; optimisation of pre-existing comorbidities; transition to primary care; and palliative care. Primary care physicians may have a crucial role to play in improving outcomes in sepsis survivors, and candidate interventions include education on common complications of post-sepsis syndrome.

Indexed as

critical illnessquality of liferehabilitationsepsissurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID40283412
PMCPMC12028095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.