Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40283307›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2025

Electronic Chip Package and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) Technology for Modern AI Era: A Review.

Guoliang Chen, Guiqi Wang, Zhenzhen Wang, Lijun Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guoliang ChenHangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University, Hangzhou 311231, China.
Guiqi WangHangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University, Hangzhou 311231, China.
Zhenzhen WangHangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University, Hangzhou 311231, China.
Lijun WangHangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University, Hangzhou 311231, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the growing demand for high-performance computing (HPC), artificial intelligence (AI), and data communication and storage, new chip technologies have emerged, following Moore's Law, over the past few decades. As we enter the post-Moore era, transistor dimensions are approaching their physical limits. Advanced packaging technologies, such as 3D chiplets hetero-integration and co-packaged optics (CPO), have become crucial for further improving system performance. Currently, most solutions rely on silicon-based technologies, which alleviate some challenges but still face issues such as warpage, bumps' reliability, through-silicon vias' (TSVs) and redistribution layers' (RDLs) reliability, and thermal dissipation, etc. Glass, with its superior mechanical, thermal, electrical, and optical properties, is emerging as a promising material to address these challenges, particularly with the development of femtosecond laser technology. This paper discusses the evolution of both conventional and advanced packaging technologies and outlines future directions for design, fabrication, and packaging using glass substrates and femtosecond laser processing.

Indexed as

2D, 2.5D and 3D packagechipletsco-packaged opticsfan-outfemtosecond laserinterposersemiconductor conventional and advanced packagesilicon and glass

Identifiers

PMID40283307
PMCPMC12029643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.