ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development of a Tool for Comprehensive Balance Assessment Based on Artificial Intelligence and Anomaly Detection.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Falls, a major cause of injury and disability, particularly among older adults, present a significant public-health challenge. Existing methods of balance assessment often lack the sensitivity and specificity needed to identify subtle deviations from normal patterns, hindering early intervention. To address this gap, we introduced a novel artificial intelligence-based tool that leverages anomaly detection to provide a comprehensive assessment of balance performance across all age groups. This study evaluated the tool's effectiveness in 163 individuals aged 18-85 years who were assessed using a force platform under four conditions: eyes open and eyes closed on firm and foam surfaces. Data analysis, employing an artificial neural network with 19 socio-anthropometric and postural variables, showed the tool's exceptional accuracy (R = 0.99998) in differentiating among balance profiles. Notably, the model highlighted the significant impact of age and education on balance, with older adults demonstrating increased reliance on visual input, especially when somatosensory information was reduced on foam surfaces. In contrast, younger, more educated individuals exhibited a more integrated sensorimotor approach. These findings demonstrate that our anomaly-detection tool can identify subtle balance impairments often missed by traditional methods, offering valuable insights for personalized fall-risk assessment and intervention. This AI-based approach can provide a holistic assessment of balance, leading to more effective strategies for fall prevention and rehabilitation, particularly in aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.