Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40283173›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Arthroscopic Anterior Cuciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Neither a Tourniquet nor Drainage: A Perioperative Case Series Report.

Dimitrios A Flevas, Michail Sarantis, Georgios Tsakotos, Grigorios G Sasalos, Anastasios V Tokis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dimitrios A FlevasArthroscopy and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, 18547 Athens, Greece.
Michail SarantisArthroscopy and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, 18547 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6457-4933
Georgios TsakotosArthroscopy and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, 18547 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8559-8969
Grigorios G SasalosArthroscopy and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, 18547 Athens, Greece.
Anastasios V TokisArthroscopy and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, 18547 Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany orthopedic surgeons recommend ischemic tourniquets during arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair to reduce blood loss and improve visibility. However, their use remains controversial due to potential complications. Similarly, the practice of postoperative drainage is debated. While its proponents argue it reduces limb swelling, DVT, adhesions, and stiffness, others contend that it may increase infection risk or harm the ACL graft and joint surfaces. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 456 patients underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between September 2015 and December 2024, without the use of a tourniquet or drainage. The patients were 334 men with a mean age of 34.7 years and 122 women with a mean age of 32.3 years. In 389 cases the graft type was a hamstring autograft, in 55 cases a patellar tendon autograft (BPTB) was used, and in 12 cases a quadriceps tendon autograft was used.

resultsThe mean operative time was 61 min (range 52-79). No cases experienced visual impairment or required ischemia to enhance visibility. Bleeding sites were successfully cauterized during arthroscopy. Postoperative complications included knee hematoma in three patients (0.7%), resolved after drainage on day one, and two infections (0.4%), treated successfully with arthroscopic drainage and implant removal. No further complications were reported.

conclusionAlthough many orthopedic surgeons prefer arthroscopic ACL repair with a tourniquet for better visibility and reduced intraoperative blood loss, this approach carries risks such as nerve palsy, joint swelling, stiffness, muscle weakness, and vascular changes. Not using a tourniquet can help to identify bleeding sites and allows for a more thorough procedure. The literature suggests that avoiding a tourniquet also reduces postoperative pain and accelerates recovery. The mean operative time for ACL reconstruction was consistent with the literature, indicating that avoiding a tourniquet did not cause delays. Additionally, the absence of postoperative drainage did not lead to complications, with most patients showing no issues like bleeding, hematoma, ischemia, or poor wound healing.

Indexed as

ACL reconstructionarthroscopyarthroscopy without tourniquetno drainageno tourniquet

Identifiers

PMID40283173
PMCPMC12028941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.