ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke Beyond 24 Hours: A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Collateral Neuroimaging for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Redefining Time and Tissue Windows in the Reperfusion Era.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe DEFUSE-3 and DAWN studies established the benefits of endovascular therapy for patients with stroke with large vessel occlusion in a 6-24 h time window. However, the effectiveness of endovascular therapy performed beyond 24 h remains uncertain. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the difference in prognosis between thrombectomies performed beyond 24 h and within 24 h from ischemic stroke onset.
methodsA systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases from database inception until 1 February 2024. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
resultsThis study included seven cohort articles involving 6137 participants who received endovascular therapy, with 395 patients in the beyond 24 h group and the remainder in the within 24 h group. The results for functional independence, successful reperfusion, any intracranial hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality rates were similar between the two groups, with odds ratios of 1.06 (95% confidence interval: 0.51-2.19), 1.03 (0.72-1.48), 0.88 (0.64-1.21), 0.76 (0.41-1.40), and 1.32 (0.55-3.19), respectively. Furthermore, all trial sequential analysis results were inconclusive.
conclusionsFunctional independence, successful reperfusion, mortality, and intracranial hemorrhage rates did not significantly differ between endovascular therapies performed beyond and within 24 h from ischemic stroke onset. Therefore, endovascular therapy may be considered for patients experiencing ischemic stroke for more than 24 h. However, randomized controlled trials and more cohort studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.