ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025
Correlation and Comparative Evaluation of MOCART and MOCART 2.0 for Assessing Cartilage Repair.
Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The MOBCART (magnetic resonance observation of bone and cartilage repair tissue) add-on score.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Beyond patient perception: PROMs correlate with objective functional tests following knee cartilage repair.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Observational
- Clinical Effectiveness and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Endurability of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation with an Autologous Periosteal Flap for Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee Joint.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Association Between MRI-Based Cartilage Repair Morphology and Clinical Outcomes After Osteochondral Autograft Transfer of the Talus.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap: Do Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Reflect Objective Knee Function After Cartilage Repair?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.