ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025
Liquid Biopsy as a Diagnostic and Monitoring Tool in Glioblastoma.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redox Regulation in Glioblastoma: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Improving T-cell engager efficacy in glioblastoma with multi-antigen targeting and novel delivery approaches.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Review
- Advances in Brain Tumor Biomarkers: From Molecular Profiling to Liquid Biopsy and AI-Driven Detection.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent and aggressive primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor in adults. GBMs exhibit genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity, posing difficulties in surveillance and being associated with high rates of recurrence and mortality. Nevertheless, due to the high infiltrating ability of glioblastoma cells, and regardless of the considerable progress made in radiotherapeutic, chemotherapeutic, and surgical protocols, the treatment of GBM is still inefficient. Conventional diagnostic approaches, such as neuroimaging techniques and tissue biopsies, which are invasive maneuvers, present certain challenges and limitations in providing real-time information, and are incapable of differentiating pseudo-progression related to treatment from real tumor progression. Liquid biopsy, the analysis of biomarkers such as nucleic acids (DNA/RNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), or tumor-educated platelets (TEPs) that are present in body fluids, provides a minimally invasive and dynamic method of diagnosis and continuous monitoring for GBM. It represents a new preferred approach that enables a superior manner to obtain data on possible tumor risk, prognosis, and recurrence assessment. This article is a literature review that aims to provide updated information about GBM biomarkers in body fluids and to analyze their clinical efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.