Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282964›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025

Optimizing Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia: Current Practices, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Fahad H Alahmadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fahad H AlahmadiRespiratory Therapy Department, College of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, Taibah University, Medina 41477, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) are a significantly major cause of mortality in Saudi Arabia, with their progression frequently involving comorbidities and exacerbations that extend beyond the lungs. This review considers the current state of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in Saudi Arabia, this being a well-known non-pharmacological intervention to help control and reduce the burden of CRDs, highlighting the intervention's availability, multidisciplinary approach, and integration within the healthcare system, as well as examining the diseases' contribution to overall symptom severity, impairing daily activities and significantly worsening the patient's quality of life. Although PR is strongly recommended for managing CRDs, its utilization in Saudi Arabia remains limited or unavailable in many regions. Key barriers to PR access include inadequate awareness among healthcare providers and patients, logistical challenges, and an insufficient number of specialized facilities and trained professionals. Expanding PR programs in Saudi Arabia requires addressing geographical barriers, ensuring adequate space, resources, and trained personnel, and raising awareness among healthcare providers through education and training. Integrating PR principles into medical education and offering incentives for specialization can help overcome personnel shortages. Additionally, promoting telerehabilitation can enhance patient compliance and ensure the long-term success of PR programs. These initiatives aim to optimize PR services and improve patient outcomes across the nation.

Indexed as

Lung DiseasesHumansQuality of LifeSaudi Arabiaasthmachronic respiratory diseaseCOPDdyspneaexercise capacitypulmonary rehabilitationquality of life

Identifiers

PMID40282964
PMCPMC12028724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.