ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Narrative Review of Epidemiology and Public Health Implications.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embolic MINOCA From Mechanical Aortic Valve Thrombosis: A Potential Role of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Chronic Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in a Young Woman Managed With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Case Report With Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Clinical Decision-Making and Imaging-Guided Follow-Up Strategies in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Exploration of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, and Clinical Implications.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Shifting Paradigms in SCAD Care: Favoring OMT Over Intervention - Lessons from a National Cohort.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Unraveling Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Sudden Cardiac Death: Integrating Pathology, Genetics, and Molecular Autopsy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Unveiled: Pathophysiology, Imaging, and Evolving Management Strategies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an uncommon but significant cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), predominantly affecting younger women without traditional cardiovascular risk factors. SCAD is defined as a non-atherosclerotic, non-traumatic dissection of the coronary artery, leading to the formation of an intramural haematoma or intimal tear causing obstruction to blood flow and myocardial ischaemia. Unlike traditional atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, SCAD has unique pathophysiological mechanisms. SCAD is thought to arise secondary to a bleed and/or dissection within the arterial wall, linked to hormonal influences with potential triggers of physical or emotional stress and predisposition such as an underlying connective tissue disorder. Despite being increasingly recognised, SCAD remains underdiagnosed, and knowledge regarding SCAD epidemiology is limited. In addition, the impact of SCAD extends beyond the immediate cardiac event, encompassing psychological distress, the need for rehabilitation, and long-term surveillance. This has implications not just for the patient but also their family and the healthcare system. This narrative review summarises the current knowledge of SCAD epidemiology, including the affected population, its associated risk factors, and healthcare impact. By identifying current gaps in knowledge, this review aims to encourage targeted research, public awareness, and policy initiatives to improve outcomes for individuals affected by SCAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.