Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282941›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Narrative Review of Epidemiology and Public Health Implications.

Patrick Pender, Mithila Zaheen, Quan M Dang, Viet Dang, James Xu, Matthew Hollings, Sidney Lo, Kazuaki Negishi, Sarah Zaman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Patrick PenderWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Mithila ZaheenWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Quan M DangWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0309-1289
Viet DangDepartment of Cardiology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2170, Australia.
James XuDepartment of Cardiology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2170, Australia.
Matthew HollingsWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-1062
Sidney LoDepartment of Cardiology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2170, Australia.
Kazuaki NegishiDepartment of Cardiology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2170, Australia.
Sarah ZamanWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6289-583X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an uncommon but significant cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), predominantly affecting younger women without traditional cardiovascular risk factors. SCAD is defined as a non-atherosclerotic, non-traumatic dissection of the coronary artery, leading to the formation of an intramural haematoma or intimal tear causing obstruction to blood flow and myocardial ischaemia. Unlike traditional atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, SCAD has unique pathophysiological mechanisms. SCAD is thought to arise secondary to a bleed and/or dissection within the arterial wall, linked to hormonal influences with potential triggers of physical or emotional stress and predisposition such as an underlying connective tissue disorder. Despite being increasingly recognised, SCAD remains underdiagnosed, and knowledge regarding SCAD epidemiology is limited. In addition, the impact of SCAD extends beyond the immediate cardiac event, encompassing psychological distress, the need for rehabilitation, and long-term surveillance. This has implications not just for the patient but also their family and the healthcare system. This narrative review summarises the current knowledge of SCAD epidemiology, including the affected population, its associated risk factors, and healthcare impact. By identifying current gaps in knowledge, this review aims to encourage targeted research, public awareness, and policy initiatives to improve outcomes for individuals affected by SCAD.

Indexed as

Coronary Vessel AnomaliesPublic HealthVascular DiseasesAcute Coronary SyndromeFemaleHumansMaleRisk Factorsacute coronary syndromeepidemiologypublic healthsexspontaneous coronary artery dissectionwomen

Identifiers

PMID40282941
PMCPMC12028618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.