ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025
The Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Echocardiographic Detection of Congenital Heart Defects in the Fetus: A Mini-Review.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in pediatrics: a bibliometric analysis of global output, networks, and frontiers [2016-2025].Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Artificial I ntelligence-Assisted Fetal Echocardiography: Improving Early Detection and Neonatal Outcomes of Congenital Heart Disease.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: clinical applications and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly gaining attention in radiology and cardiology for accurately diagnosing structural heart disease. In this review paper, we first outline the technical background of AI and echocardiography and then present an array of clinical applications, including image quality control, cardiac function measurements, defect detection, and classifications. Collectively, we answer how integrating AI technologies and echocardiography can help improve the detection of congenital heart defects. Particularly, the superior sensitivity of AI-based congenital heart defect (CHD) detection in the fetus (>90%) allows it to be potentially translated into the clinical workflow as an effective screening tool in an obstetric setting. However, the current AI technologies still have many limitations, and more technological developments are required to enable these AI technologies to reach their full potential. Also, integrating diagnostic AI technologies into the clinical workflow should resolve ethical concerns. Otherwise, deploying diagnostic AI may not address low-resource populations' healthcare access disadvantages. Instead, it will further exacerbate the access disparities. We envision that, through the combination of tele-echocardiography and AI, low-resource medical facilities may gain access to the effective detection of CHD at the prenatal stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.