Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282838›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Supplier Risk Assessment-A Quantitative Tool for the Identification of Reliable Suppliers to Enhance Food Safety Across the Supply Chain.

Sina Röhrs, Sascha Rohn, Yvonne Pfeifer, Anna Romanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sina RöhrsSGS Germany GmbH, Health and Nutrition, Heidenkampsweg 99, 20097 Hamburg, Germany.
Sascha RohnDepartment of Food Chemistry and Analysis, Institute of Food Technology and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Berlin, Gustav Meyer Allee 25, 13355 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5009-8830
Yvonne PfeiferSGS Germany GmbH, Health and Nutrition, Heidenkampsweg 99, 20097 Hamburg, Germany.
Anna RomanovaSGS Estonia Ltd., Vana-Narva mnt. 27A, 74114 Maardu, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food safety is a global issue that can be enhanced by collaboration with reliable suppliers. Given the complexities of international supply chains, identifying reliable suppliers is often challenging and resource-intensive. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) offers a valuable opportunity to improve efficiency in this process. The aim of the present study was to develop a quantitative supplier assessment scheme for implementation in an AI-supported database. The framework developed incorporates different indicators, including the hazard risk, incident category level, vulnerability of a commodity, audit performance, logistic performance index, gross domestic product (GDP) growth, and GDP per capita. Each indicator is evaluated according to its own distinct assessment. Ultimately, the sub-assessments are integrated into the calculation of a supplier's overall risk score. Hereby, it is possible to set individual weightings for each indicator. Manual testing using an exemplary selected supplier yielded promising results, indicating that the next steps involve implementation into an AI-supported database. It can be concluded that such an assessment framework can be an effective method for the identification of reliable suppliers. A future challenge will be to establish incentives to make audit data freely available, as these are often restricted and cannot be considered in the supplier risk assessment.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencefood safetysupplier risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40282838
PMCPMC12026463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.