ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Supplier Risk Assessment-A Quantitative Tool for the Identification of Reliable Suppliers to Enhance Food Safety Across the Supply Chain.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food safety is a global issue that can be enhanced by collaboration with reliable suppliers. Given the complexities of international supply chains, identifying reliable suppliers is often challenging and resource-intensive. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) offers a valuable opportunity to improve efficiency in this process. The aim of the present study was to develop a quantitative supplier assessment scheme for implementation in an AI-supported database. The framework developed incorporates different indicators, including the hazard risk, incident category level, vulnerability of a commodity, audit performance, logistic performance index, gross domestic product (GDP) growth, and GDP per capita. Each indicator is evaluated according to its own distinct assessment. Ultimately, the sub-assessments are integrated into the calculation of a supplier's overall risk score. Hereby, it is possible to set individual weightings for each indicator. Manual testing using an exemplary selected supplier yielded promising results, indicating that the next steps involve implementation into an AI-supported database. It can be concluded that such an assessment framework can be an effective method for the identification of reliable suppliers. A future challenge will be to establish incentives to make audit data freely available, as these are often restricted and cannot be considered in the supplier risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.