Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282775›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Comparison of Ultraviolet A, B and C Treatments in Preserving the Quality and Nutritional Integrity of Fresh-Cut Spinach.

Hakan Kibar, Beyhan Kibar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hakan KibarDepartment of Seed Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu 14030, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1739-4547
Beyhan KibarDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu 14030, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9253-5747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation (UVA, UVB, and UVC) on the postharvest quality and nutritional stability of fresh-cut spinach during cold storage. Spinach samples were exposed to UV treatments for 0, 5, or 10 min and stored at 4 ± 1 °C with 85 ± 5% relative humidity for up to 10 days. Weight loss, dry matter content, total soluble solids, electrical conductivity, pH, respiration rate, color parameters, ash content, and mineral composition were assessed. The results showed that UVB-treated spinach had the lowest weight loss (0.52%), compared to UVC-treated (0.75%) and control (0.82%) samples. The dry matter content was highest in UVB-treated samples (9.56%) and lowest in UVC-treated samples (8.62%). UVC exposure increased electrical conductivity (112 µS cm

Indexed as

mineral compositionpostharvest storagequalitySpinacia oleracea L.ultraviolet irradiation

Identifiers

PMID40282775
PMCPMC12026952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.