Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282652›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

DDML: Multi-Student Knowledge Distillation for Hate Speech.

Ze Liu, Zerui Shao, Haizhou Wang, Beibei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ze LiuSchool of Cyber Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610211, China.
Zerui ShaoSchool of Cyber Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610211, China.
Haizhou WangSchool of Cyber Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610211, China.
Beibei LiSchool of Cyber Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610211, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0485-1975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that hate speech on social media negatively impacts users' mental health and is a contributing factor to suicide attempts. On a broader scale, online hate speech can undermine social stability. With the continuous growth of the internet, the prevalence of online hate speech is rising, making its detection an urgent issue. Recent advances in natural language processing, particularly with transformer-based models, have shown significant promise in hate speech detection. However, these models come with a large number of parameters, leading to high computational requirements and making them difficult to deploy on personal computers. To address these challenges, knowledge distillation offers a solution by training smaller student networks using larger teacher networks. Recognizing that learning also occurs through peer interactions, we propose a knowledge distillation method called Deep Distill-Mutual Learning (DDML). DDML employs one teacher network and two or more student networks. While the student networks benefit from the teacher's knowledge, they also engage in mutual learning with each other. We trained numerous deep neural networks for hate speech detection based on DDML and demonstrated that these networks perform well across various datasets. We tested our method across ten languages and nine datasets. The results demonstrate that DDML enhances the performance of deep neural networks, achieving an average F1 score increase of 4.87% over the baseline.

Indexed as

DDMLhate speech detectionknowledge distillation

Identifiers

PMID40282652
PMCPMC12025758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.