ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Identifying Influential Nodes Based on Evidence Theory in Complex Network.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Deng Entropy-Based Heuristic Method to Determine Discounting Coefficient in Dempster-Shafer Evidence Fusion.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ODE-BPA: A Novel Basic Probability Assignment Generation Method Based on OTSU and Deng Entropy.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Influential node identification is an important and hot topic in the field of complex network science. Classical algorithms for identifying influential nodes are typically based on a single attribute of nodes or the simple fusion of a few attributes. However, these methods perform poorly in real networks with high complexity and diversity. To address this issue, a new method based on the Dempster-Shafer (DS) evidence theory is proposed in this paper, which improves the efficiency of identifying influential nodes through the following three aspects. Firstly, Dempster-Shafer evidence theory quantifies uncertainty through its basic belief assignment function and combines evidence from different information sources, enabling it to effectively handle uncertainty. Secondly, Dempster-Shafer evidence theory processes conflicting evidence using Dempster's rule of combination, enhancing the reliability of decision-making. Lastly, in complex networks, information may come from multiple dimensions, and the Dempster-Shafer theory can effectively integrate this multidimensional information. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, extensive experiments are conducted on real-world complex networks. The results show that, compared to the other algorithms, attacking the influential nodes identified by the DS method is more likely to lead to the disintegration of the network, which indicates that the DS method is more effective for identifying the key nodes in the network. To further validate the reliability of the proposed algorithm, we use the visibility graph algorithm to convert the GBP futures time series into a complex network and then rank the nodes in the network using the DS method. The results show that the top-ranked nodes correspond to the peaks and troughs of the time series, which represents the key turning points in price changes. By conducting an in-depth analysis, investors can uncover major events that influence price trends, once again confirming the effectiveness of the algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.