ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
AI Painting Effect Evaluation of Artistic Improvement with Cross-Entropy and Attention.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid development of AI technology, AI painting tools are increasingly used in art creation. However, the effects of works created by different users using AI painting tools vary. Finding out the factors that affect the level of art creation after users use AI painting tools is a matter of concern. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a new Multi-Classification Attention Support Vector Machine (MCASVM) with cross-entropy loss function. By identifying and predicting the level of creativity of ordinary users after using AI painting tools, this model compares and analyzes the influencing factors behind the high and low effects of artistic creativity enhancement after using AI painting tools. The main contribution of this paper is to establish the Art Creation Ability Assessment Dataset (ACAAD) through real data collection to provide data support for subsequent assessments. Meanwhile, MCASVM directly handles the multi-classification problem in the established dataset by introducing multiple SVMs. Among other things, the probabilistic calibration network adjusts the model output so that its predicted probabilities are closer to the probability that the sample truly belongs to the classification. DBAM enhances the feature fusion capability of the model by explicitly focusing on the important channel and spatial features, and it enables the model to more accurately recognize and differentiate between changes in the creative abilities of different users before and after using AI painting tools. The experimental results show that the artistic creativity of ordinary users can be enhanced by AI painting tools, where the most central influencing factors are interest level and social support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.