ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Encrypted Spiking Neural Networks Based on Adaptive Differential Privacy Mechanism.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spike neural networks (SNNs) perform excellently in various domains. However, SNNs based on differential privacy (DP) protocols introduce uniform noise to the gradient parameters, which may affect the trade-off between model efficiency and personal privacy. Therefore, the adaptive differential private SNN (ADPSNN) is proposed in this work. It dynamically adjusts the privacy budget based on the correlations between the output spikes and labels. In addition, the noise is added to the gradient parameters according to the privacy budget. The ADPSNN is tested on four datasets with different spiking neurons including leaky integrated-and-firing (LIF) and integrate-and-fire (IF) models. Experimental results show that the LIF neuron model provides superior utility on the MNIST (accuracy 99.56%) and Fashion-MNIST (accuracy 92.26%) datasets, while the IF neuron model performs well on the CIFAR10 (accuracy 90.67%) and CIFAR100 (accuracy 66.10%) datasets. Compared to existing methods, the accuracy of ADPSNN is improved by 0.09% to 3.1%. The ADPSNN has many potential applications, such as image classification, health care, and intelligent driving.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.