Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282562›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Methods for Brain Connectivity Analysis with Applications to Rat Local Field Potential Recordings.

Anass B El-Yaagoubi, Sipan Aslan, Farah Gomawi, Paolo V Redondo, Sarbojit Roy, Malik S Sultan, Mara S Talento, Francine T Tarrazona, Haibo Wu, Keiland W Cooper and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Neurodatascience: Past, Present, and Future.Data science in science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anass B El-YaagoubiStatistics Program, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8886-0587
Sipan AslanStatistics Program, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.
Farah GomawiStatistics Program, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.
Paolo V RedondoStatistics Program, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.
Sarbojit RoyStatistics Program, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1659-7318
Malik S SultanStatistics Program, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.
Mara S TalentoStatistics Program, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2375-8634
Francine T TarrazonaStatistics Program, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.
Haibo WuStatistics Program, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.
Keiland W CooperDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0358-9645
Norbert J FortinDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6793-6984
Hernando OmbaoStatistics Program, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling the brain dependence network is central to understanding underlying neural mechanisms such as perception, action, and memory. In this study, we present a broad range of statistical methods for analyzing dependence in a brain network. Leveraging a combination of classical and cutting-edge approaches, we analyze multivariate hippocampal local field potential (LFP) time series data concentrating on the encoding of nonspatial olfactory information in rats. We present the strengths and limitations of each method in capturing neural dynamics and connectivity. Our analysis begins with exploratory techniques, including correlation, partial correlation, spectral matrices, and coherence, to establish foundational connectivity insights. We then investigate advanced methods such as Granger causality (GC), robust canonical coherence analysis, spectral transfer entropy (STE), and wavelet coherence to capture dynamic and nonlinear interactions. Additionally, we investigate the utility of topological data analysis (TDA) to extract multi-scale topological features and explore deep learning-based canonical correlation frameworks for connectivity modeling. This comprehensive approach offers an introduction to the state-of-the-art techniques for the analysis of dependence networks, emphasizing the unique strengths of various methodologies, addressing computational challenges, and paving the way for future research.

Indexed as

brain functional connectivitydependence networksGranger causalitylocal field potentialsspectral transfer entropytopological data analysiswavelet coherence

Identifiers

PMID40282562
PMCPMC12025641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.