ArticleCancers2025
Radiobiological Meta-Analysis of the Response of Prostate Cancer to High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Investigation of the Reduction in Control for Extreme Hypofractionation.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesClinical studies have shown a marked reduction in tumor control in prostate cancer treated with radically hypofractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). The purpose of this study was to analyze the dose-response of prostate cancer treated with HDR-BT, specifically aiming at investigating the potential failure of the linear-quadratic (LQ) model to describe the response at large doses-per-fraction.
methodsWe collated a dataset of dose-response to HDR-BT (3239 patients). The analysis was conducted separately for low and intermediate risk, resulting in 21 schedules (1633 patients) and 23 schedules (1606 patients), respectively. Data were fitted to tumor control probability models based on the LQ model, the linear-quadratic-linear (LQL), and a modification of the LQ model to include the effect of reoxygenation during treatment.
resultsThe LQ cannot fit the data unless the α/β is allowed to be high (∼[20, >100] Gy, 95% confidence interval). If the α/β is constrained to be low (≤8 Gy), the LQ model cannot reproduce the clinical results, and the LQL model, which includes a moderation of radiation damage with increasing dose, significantly improves the fitting. On the other hand, the reoxygenation model does not match the results obtained with the LQL. The clinically observed reduction in tumor control in prostate cancer treated with radical HDR-BT is better described by the LQL model. Using the best-fitting parameters, the BED for a 20 Gy × 1 treatment (128 Gyα/β) is far less than that of a conventional 2 Gy × 37 fractionation (196 Gyα/β).
conclusionsOur analysis showed that the substantial loss of tumor control observed in extremely hypofractionated HDR-BT trials can only be explained by the LQ model if the α/β is very large (≥100 Gy), in clear disagreement with the limits set in the analysis of external radiotherapy data. It seems more reasonable that there is a moderation of the LQ-predicted effect with increasing dose per fraction. These results may assist in the design of radical HDR-BT treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.