Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282478›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Review of Adoptive Cellular Therapies for the Treatment of Sarcoma.

James J Fradin, John A Charlson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Adoptive T-Cell Therapy in Sarcomas.Current oncology reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James J FradinDivision of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
John A CharlsonDivision of Hematology & Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2426-0029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with limited therapeutic options, particularly in the metastatic setting. Adoptive cellular therapies (ACTs), including tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, and T-cell receptor (TCR) gene-modified T-cell therapy, offer promising novel approaches for these refractory tumors. TIL-based therapy has demonstrated early efficacy in melanoma and myeloma, with ongoing trials exploring its role in sarcoma. CAR T-cell strategies targeting HER2, GD2, and B7-H3 antigens are in development, though challenges such as tumor microenvironment-mediated resistance and antigen escape remain significant. Engineered TCRs, particularly those targeting MAGE-A4 and NY-ESO-1, have shown promising clinical results in synovial sarcoma (SS) and myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS), leading to the recent FDA approval of afamitresgene autoleucel (afami-cel) and letetresgene autoleucel (lete-cel). Despite encouraging preliminary data, ACT implementation faces barriers including limited antigen specificity, off-tumor toxicity, immune evasion, and manufacturing scalability. Future research will focus on optimizing lymphodepleting regimens, mitigating toxicity, enhancing in vivo persistence, and combining ACT with other therapeutic agents. As clinical trials expand, ACT holds the potential to revolutionize sarcoma treatment by offering durable, targeted therapies for previously refractory disease.

Indexed as

adoptive cellular therapychimeric antigen receptorengineered T-cell receptorsarcomatumor infiltrating lymphocyte

Identifiers

PMID40282478
PMCPMC12026197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.