ArticleGenes2025
Inferring the Degree of Relatedness and Kinship Types Using an All-in-One Marker Set.
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Distant Kinship Inference and Forensic Genetic Genealogy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesKinship inference is commonly adopted in various forensic applications, but previous studies have often lacked precision.
methodsIn this study, a new method for the nomenclature of kinship types, i.e., kinship chain (KC), was proposed, and then, six types of identity by state (IBS) scores were calculated for simulated and real families using four types of markers. Finally, several Bayesian network (BN)-based classifiers were constructed to investigate the efficiency of the kinship inference.
resultsA total of 7, 22, 58, and 3 KCs were obtained for common first-, second-, and third-degree relatives and unrelated pairs, respectively. High accuracies could be achieved in distinguishing between related and unrelated pairs after combining the four types of genetic markers, with an accuracy of >99.99% for all 7 KCs of first-degree relationships and ~99% for 14 out of 22 KCs of second-degree relatives. When comparing relationships of the same degree, the accuracies were 99.28%, 42.31%, and 15.82% for first-, second-, and third-degree relationships, respectively. When it came to differentiating unspecific relationships, the overall accuracy was over 80%. All the results were validated on real family data.
conclusionsWith the new nomenclature method of kinship types and the combination of autosomal and non-autosomal genetic markers, kinship inference can be realized with high accuracy and precision, which will be helpful in complex forensic cases, such as the identification of mass disaster victims.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.