Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282415›Full record

ArticleGenes2025

Inferring the Degree of Relatedness and Kinship Types Using an All-in-One Marker Set.

Ran Li, Yu Zang, Jiajun Liu, Enlin Wu, Riga Wu, Hongyu Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ran LiMedical College, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514031, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6473-4570
Yu ZangFaculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6421-5455
Jiajun LiuFaculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Enlin WuFaculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID 0009-0006-9113-4136
Riga WuFaculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8594-2843
Hongyu SunFaculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2024YFC3306702National Natural Science Foundation of China 81971798National Natural Science Foundation of China 82302125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesKinship inference is commonly adopted in various forensic applications, but previous studies have often lacked precision.

methodsIn this study, a new method for the nomenclature of kinship types, i.e., kinship chain (KC), was proposed, and then, six types of identity by state (IBS) scores were calculated for simulated and real families using four types of markers. Finally, several Bayesian network (BN)-based classifiers were constructed to investigate the efficiency of the kinship inference.

resultsA total of 7, 22, 58, and 3 KCs were obtained for common first-, second-, and third-degree relatives and unrelated pairs, respectively. High accuracies could be achieved in distinguishing between related and unrelated pairs after combining the four types of genetic markers, with an accuracy of >99.99% for all 7 KCs of first-degree relationships and ~99% for 14 out of 22 KCs of second-degree relatives. When comparing relationships of the same degree, the accuracies were 99.28%, 42.31%, and 15.82% for first-, second-, and third-degree relationships, respectively. When it came to differentiating unspecific relationships, the overall accuracy was over 80%. All the results were validated on real family data.

conclusionsWith the new nomenclature method of kinship types and the combination of autosomal and non-autosomal genetic markers, kinship inference can be realized with high accuracy and precision, which will be helpful in complex forensic cases, such as the identification of mass disaster victims.

Indexed as

Forensic GeneticsPedigreeBayes TheoremGenetic MarkersHumansGenetic Markersgenetic markersidentity by state (IBS)kinship chainkinship inference

Identifiers

PMID40282415
PMCPMC12026669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.