ArticleGenes2025
Deciphering Gut Microbiome in Colorectal Cancer via Robust Learning Methods.
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide and is closely linked to the gut microbiota. Identifying reproducible and generalizable microbial signatures holds significant potential for enhancing early detection and advancing treatment for this deadly disease.
methodsThis study integrated various publicly available case-control datasets to identify microbial signatures for CRC. Alpha and beta diversity metrics were evaluated to characterize differences in gut microbial richness, evenness, and overall composition between CRC patients and healthy controls. Differential abundance analysis was conducted using ANCOM-BC and LEfSe to pinpoint individual taxa that were enriched or depleted in CRC patients. Additionally, sccomp, a Bayesian machine learning method from single-cell analysis, was adapted to provide a more robust validation of compositional differences in individual microbial markers.
resultsGut microbial richness is significantly higher in CRC patients, and overall microbiome composition differs significantly between CRC patients and healthy controls. Several taxa, such as
conclusionsBiologically, the microbial signatures identified from the integrated data improve our understanding of the gut microbiota's role in CRC pathogenesis and may contribute to the development of translational targets and microbiota-based therapies. Methodologically, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of adapting robust techniques from single-cell research to improve the precision of microbial marker discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.