ReviewGenes2025
Genetically Transitional Disease and the Road to Personalized Medicine.
Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetically transitional disease (GTD) is emerging as a new concept in genomic medicine to straddle between the traditional binary classification of monogenic and polygenic disease. Genetic testing result reports in molecular laboratories have been predicated on the monogenic disease model, which focuses on pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants. While variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are reported by laboratories, there are challenges with regard to their clinical application so that these variants are often dismissed by ordering physicians. Unlike Mendelian disorders, where genetic variants are of high penetrance and highly probabilistic, the GTD concept is employed to highlight the impact of low-to-moderate effect gene variants whose influence on disease is modified by the genetic background. The GTD concept may explain health conditions associated with variants that are necessary but not sufficient for pathogenesis, lying in the mid gray zone between Mendelian and polygenic diseases. Although VUSs may not reach the level of pathogenicity based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines, they could be provisionally classified as GTD-associated variants to annotate and interpret the relationship between VUS and human genetic disease. The appropriate implementation of the GTD concept could impact patient care and research by focusing attention on the individual variability of responses in various diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.