ReviewGenes2025
Molecular Landscape and Diagnostic Model of MASH: Transcriptomic, Proteomic, Metabolomic, and Lipidomic Perspectives.
Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Deciphering cytochrome P450 reductase role in MASLD: molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological implications.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Cognitive-Enhancing Effects of Bioactive Compounds and Traditional Herbal Medicines in Elderly Patients with Metabolic Syndrome.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Exosomal bioactive molecules: molecular regulation, functional heterogeneity, and translational implications in disease diagnostics and therapeutics.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Gut Microbiota Has the Potential to Improve Sarcopenic Obesity in Menopausal Women by Regulating Estrogen.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Loss of immunometabolic adaptability in MASH: gut-derived signals drive macrophage reprogramming and fibrosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), a progressive form of fatty liver disease, presents a significant global health challenge. Despite extensive research, fully elucidating its complex pathogenesis and developing accurate non-invasive diagnostic tools remain key goals. Multi-omics approaches, integrating data from transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and lipidomics, offer a powerful strategy to achieve these aims. This review summarizes key findings from multi-omics studies in MASH, highlighting their contributions to our understanding of disease mechanisms and the development of improved diagnostic models. Transcriptomic studies have revealed widespread gene dysregulation affecting lipid metabolism, inflammation, and fibrosis, while proteomics has identified altered protein expression patterns and potential biomarkers. Metabolomic and lipidomic analyses have further uncovered significant changes in various metabolites and lipid species, including ceramides, sphingomyelins, phospholipids, and bile acids, underscoring the central role of lipid dysregulation in MASH. These multi-omics findings have been leveraged to develop novel diagnostic models, some incorporating machine learning algorithms, with improved accuracy compared to traditional methods. Further research is needed to validate these findings, explore the complex interplay between different omics layers, and translate these discoveries into clinically useful tools for improved MASH diagnosis and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.