ArticleGenes2025
Techniques for Validating CRISPR Changes Using RNA-Sequencing Data.
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of CRISPR to knockdown or knockout genes is a powerful tool for understanding the specific role of a gene in disease development. However, it can cause many unanticipated changes to the transcriptome that are not detected by DNA amplification and Sanger sequencing of the target site. Various RNA-sequencing techniques can be used to identify these changes and effectively gauge the full impact of the CRISPR knockout, thereby providing a means of selecting appropriate clones for further experimentation. BACKGROUND/
objectivesRNA-seq data from 4 CRISPR knockout experiments were analyzed and techniques developed to both confirm the success of the CRISPR modifications and identify potential issues.
methodsA broad-based analysis of RNA-sequencing data identified many CRISPR-based changes not identified by PCR amplification of DNA around the CRISPR target site. These changes included an inter-chromosomal fusion event, exon skipping, chromosomal truncation, and the unintentional transcriptional modification and amplification of a neighboring gene.
conclusionsThe inadvertent modifications identified by the evaluation of 4 CRISPR experiments highlight the value of using RNA-seq to identify transcriptional changes to cells altered by CRISPR, many of which cannot be recognized by evaluating DNA alone. Specific guidelines are presented for designing and analyzing CRISPR experiments using RNA-seq data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.