ReviewGenes2025
Evaluation of DNA in Human Teeth-Ante-Mortem and Post-Mortem Factors Affecting Degradation and Preservation: A Literature Review.
Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age estimation from DNA methylation in sectioned pulp-free teeth.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Multiple forensic insights for human identification using single teeth with applicability to advanced postmortem remains.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Forensic dental age estimation in a Pakistani population: validation of Atlas methods and development of a population-specific reference model.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Sex Estimation from Canine Measurements on Panoramic Radiographs: Comparison with Manual Analysis in a Romanian Sample.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing the Micro- and Macroscopic Changes of Chemically Altered Human Bone and Teeth.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Forensic Odontology in the Digital Era: A Narrative Review of Current Methods and Emerging Trends.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification of human remains is a major challenge in forensic science, particularly in cases of advanced decomposition. Human teeth are among the most resilient tissues to environmental and post-mortem degradation, making them a valuable source of DNA for forensic identification. However, DNA preservation in teeth is influenced by multiple factors that can compromise the success of genetic analysis.
objectiveThis review analyzes the intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting DNA preservation in human teeth, focusing on ante-mortem and post-mortem variables rather than the methodological aspects of DNA extraction and analysis. METHODOLOGY: A review of the literature was conducted, evaluating studies that assess the impact of biological factors (such as dental structure, pathology, and treatment) and environmental conditions (such as burial environment, temperature, and humidity) on DNA degradation in human teeth.
resultsThe findings indicate that DNA preservation is significantly influenced by the type of tooth, the presence of dental restorations or pathological conditions, and exposure to environmental factors. While some studies address these variables individually, forensic cases often involve complex interactions among multiple factors, making DNA recovery outcomes unpredictable.
conclusionsThe degradation of DNA in human teeth results from a multifactorial process where intrinsic and extrinsic elements interact dynamically. A comprehensive understanding of these factors is essential for optimizing sampling strategies and improving DNA recovery success rates in forensic applications. Future research should aim to develop predictive models that account for these variables, enabling more effective case-specific approaches to forensic DNA analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.