Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282230›Full record

ReviewBiology2025

Current Progress and Future Trends in Carbon Sources and Sinks in Farmland Ecosystems: A Bibliometric Analysis (2002-2023).

Yugong Pang, Menghao Zhang, Hesen Zhong, Tibihenda Cevin, Chuanzhun Sun, Shoutao Zhang, Xinyu Li, Jun Dai, Chengshuai Liu, Chi Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yugong PangCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID 0009-0000-9140-2176
Menghao ZhangCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Hesen ZhongCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Tibihenda CevinCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Chuanzhun SunCollege of Public Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Shoutao ZhangCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Xinyu LiCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Jun DaiCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Chengshuai LiuCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Chi ZhangCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4593-7783

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42471288the Agricultural Science and Technology Development and Resource-Environment Protection Management Project of Guangdong Province 2022KJ161the Scientific Research Project of the Guangdong Provincial Department of Natural Resources: Key Technology Research for Construction in Centralized Cultivated Land Remediation Areas in Guangdong Province GDZRZYKJ2024009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Farmland ecosystems, as the most active carbon pool, are integral to global climate change and carbon cycling. Therefore, systematically studying the roles of carbon sources and sinks in farmland ecosystems is essential to deepening our understanding of the carbon cycle and meeting the goals of "peak carbon emissions" and "carbon neutrality" in agriculture. Using the Web of Science database, this study reviewed 1411 articles (2002-2023) via bibliometric analysis to identify key research themes, trends, future priorities and address suggestions for future directions in farmland ecosystem carbon sources and sinks. The main results include the following: (1) Over the past 22 years, global research in this field has shown a consistent growth trend, with remarkably rapid expansion in the past three years. China, the United States, and Germany are the most influential countries. As the research scope has expanded, the field has evolved into an interdisciplinary domain. (2) The diversity of this research area has become enriched, and the research content is becoming more refined and systematic. The main research topics focus on carbon sequestration, soil organic carbon (SOC), farmland management, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, carbon stocks, ecosystem services, land use changes, climate change, and spatiotemporal heterogeneity. (3) Current research hotspots primarily focus on studying soil microbial carbon sequestration mechanisms, the application of remote sensing technologies, and reducing GHG emissions to achieve "carbon neutrality". While existing studies have systematically elucidated carbon sequestration mechanisms mediated by soil aggregates, microorganisms, and minerals, critical knowledge gaps persist. Regional disparities in the relative contributions of these mechanisms remain unresolved, compounded by methodological inconsistencies in carbon assessment that introduce substantial uncertainties. Although farmland management practices are identified as pivotal drivers of carbon flux variation, the interactive effects of anthropogenic interventions and natural factors on ecosystem-scale carbon balance require further mechanistic exploration. This review provides a comprehensive reference for further study on carbon sources and sinks of farmland ecosystems and devising effective emission reduction strategies.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysiscarbon sequestrationcarbon sinkcarbon sourcesfarmland ecosystemsoil organic carbon (SOC)

Identifiers

PMID40282230
PMCPMC12024742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.