ArticleBiology2025
Unlocking the Potential of Animal Hair Shafts for Genomic Studies: A Comprehensive Evaluation of DNA Quality.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hair is a prominent physiological feature of many animals that can be easily and non-invasively sampled. However, most previous studies have focused on human hair, and animal hair has not been widely used as a DNA source in genetic and evolutionary studies. Analysing the DNA quality of animal hair is more challenging than that of human hair because it varies across different species and is influenced by different storage conditions. To address this gap in our knowledge, this study systematically evaluated the DNA quality of various animal hair samples. Our findings show that lightly medullated hairs, which are typical in carnivores, yield greater amounts of DNA and have better sequencing results than highly medullated hairs, which are typical in ungulate herbivores. Furthermore, the roots and middle hair were more productive than the upper hair parts. Tanning and storage time impair DNA yield and sequencing quality and increase nucleotide damage. Moreover, for certain historical specimens and field samples, genomic DNA was more successfully obtained from hair samples than from skin samples. This study provides data and theoretical support for improving the use of animal hair in genetic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.