Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282194›Full record

ArticleBiology2025

Recommendations on How to Use Flight Initiation Distance Data in Birds.

Magne Husby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Magne HusbySection of Science, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7015-5011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birds and other wildlife are negatively affected by many anthropogenic activities, including human recreational activities, which are often not considered in area planning. Here, I present factors affecting the flight initiation distance (FID)-the distance to an approaching human at which birds flee-for 1075 different flocks of waterbirds. The FID varied greatly between groups of birds and species. For some bird groups and species, the FID was longer in rural areas than in urban areas and increased with flock size and with disturbance from canoeing. In addition to the differences in FID between species and groups of species, there are two important conclusions from this study: (1) a graphical relationship between the proportion of birds that flee at different distances from an approaching person gives more information than mean or median FID values and should be used by nature managers, and (2) the FID should be investigated in each area before mitigating actions or new constructions are decided, considering all the factors affecting it. A global database with a mixture of FID values from a huge number of areas is valuable for some purposes but can be misleading for individuals in a specific area.

Indexed as

alert distancecanoeing disturbancedog disturbancedrone disturbanceFIDflock sizehuman disturbancenature managementshorebirdsurban–ruralwaterbirds

Identifiers

PMID40282194
PMCPMC12025121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.