Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282138›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Understanding Pre-Service Teachers' Perceptions of the Ideal Learning Environment for Mathematical Activities Through Drawings.

Tuğba Yulet Yılmaz, Mustafa Gök

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tuğba Yulet YılmazDepartment of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Education, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, 65080 Van, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2872-4062
Mustafa GökDepartment of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Education, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, 65080 Van, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9349-4078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical activities, which have the potential to engage students cognitively, are an essential component of modern educational approaches. The design of learning environments that facilitate the full realization of the potential of mathematical activities is as crucial as the activities themselves. Well-designed physical, social, and emotional learning environments significantly contribute to students' holistic development. Pre-service teachers' perceptions regarding the ideal learning environment for mathematical activities can shape the quality of learning environments they will create professionally. This study explores the perceptions of pre-service primary school teachers and pre-service elementary mathematics teachers regarding the ideal learning environment for mathematical activities through their drawings and related reflections. This study employs a qualitative case study design, and data were collected through freehand drawings depicting ideal learning environments and semi-structured interviews with pre-service teachers. The analysis reveals five prominent components of the ideal learning environment for mathematical activities: purpose, instructional methods and techniques, teacher-student roles, seating arrangements, and interrelations among these components. The findings indicate differences in perceptions between pre-service primary school teachers and pre-service elementary mathematics teachers. Additionally, the results highlight that these components are interrelated within the learning environment, with the purpose component serving as a guiding factor for the others.

Indexed as

drawingslearning environmentmathematical activitiespre-service teachers

Identifiers

PMID40282138
PMCPMC12024228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.