ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Sharp Skills or Snipping Struggles? Qualitative Paper-Cutting Performance in 5- to 10-Year-Old Children Using Hands-On!
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined age-related changes in qualitative paper-cutting performance of typically developing children aged 5 to 10 years. Using the Hands-On! observation tool, we analysed 178 (85 boys; Mage 8.06 years, SD ± 1.58) children's performance on the DCDDaily paper cutting task. Paper cutting involves several intra-task components, such as grip type and cutting movements, each comprising multiple observable actions that reflect a child's qualitative performance (e.g., small or large cutting movements). We assessed the differences in the occurrence of these actions within each intra-task component across age groups, along with task duration and mistakes. Our findings revealed significant age-related differences in the qualitative performance of multiple actions within the intra-task components. Three distinct developmental patterns emerged: progression, variability in progression, and stability. Notably, these qualitative differences were observed even when quantitative measures, such as duration and mistakes, showed ceiling effects, highlighting the ability of qualitative assessments to capture nuanced developmental changes. This study provides valuable insights into the development of paper-cutting skills, emphasising the importance of incorporating qualitative analysis into motor skill assessments. Future research should explore the qualitative performance of children with both typical and atypical motor development to further understand the complex interplay of factors influencing fine motor skill performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.