ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multi-Faceted Assessment of Children with Selective Mutism: Challenges and Practical Suggestions.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The multi-faceted nature of Selective Mutism (SM), and its comorbidity with other disorders, necessitates a comprehensive assessment process. However, evaluating children with SM presents significant challenges, including difficulties in building rapport, establishing an accurate diagnosis, and conducting formal psychological and neuropsychological assessments. This paper explores the key obstacles in assessing children with SM and provides practical recommendations for overcoming these challenges. Effective strategies for reducing anxiety during assessments include extended rapport-building phases, playful and engaging interactions, and the strategic use of parental involvement. Additionally, given the variability in SM symptoms across different settings, a multi-informant and multi-method assessment approach-including clinical observation, structured interviews, and standardized parent- and teacher-report measures-is recommended. This paper also discusses adaptations for formal testing, particularly in cognitive, language, and neurodevelopmental assessments, where SM-related speech avoidance can interfere with standardized evaluations. Nonverbal assessment tools, modifications to testing environments, and alternative response formats are proposed as potential solutions. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of differentiating SM from overlapping conditions, such as autism spectrum disorder and language impairments, to ensure accurate diagnosis and intervention planning. By implementing tailored assessment strategies, clinicians and researchers can improve diagnostic accuracy and better understand the unique needs of children with SM. This, in turn, can inform individualized treatment plans, enhance educational placement decisions, and support the overall well-being of children with SM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.