ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Bilingual Proficiency Effects on Word Recall and Recognition.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of bilingual proficiency on word recognition and recall across different memory tasks, with a focus on Chinese-English bilinguals. Participants learned lists of words in either their L1 (Chinese) or L2 (English) language while performing a semantic judgment task. Their memory for the learned words was subsequently assessed using three distinct tasks: a word recognition task (Experiment 1), a picture endorsement task (Experiment 2), and a free recall task (Experiment 3). The results revealed a significant L2 advantage in word recognition, as evidenced by higher hit rates, lower false alarm rates, and greater discrimination scores for L2 words. Furthermore, altering the retrieval cues from words to pictures led to a significant decrease in memory performance, but this did not diminish the L2 advantage. However, removing retrieval cues entirely eliminated the L2 advantage: participants demonstrated similar levels of correct recall for both L1 and L2 words, but showed a higher frequency of false recall for L1 words. To account for these dissociations between recall and recognition tasks, a level-based bilingual cognitive efficiency framework was proposed, incorporating factors such as pre-experimental exposure, cognitive resource allocation, the strength of lexical associations, and the demands of retrieval cues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.