ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Psychometric Evaluation of the Performance Perfectionism Scale for Sport in the South Korean Context.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to validate the Performance Perfectionism Scale for Sport (PPS-S) for use in South Korean student-athletes, addressing the critical need for a culturally appropriate measure of perfectionism in sport. The PPS-S was translated following established cross-cultural research protocols, including forward-backward translation and cognitive interviews. Participants were 332 collegiate athletes (79.5% male, 20.5% female; proportionate to the national collegiate athletic population distribution) registered with the Korean Sport and Olympic Committee. Confirmatory factor analysis using robust maximum likelihood estimation confirmed the three-factor structure (self-oriented, socially prescribed, and other-oriented perfectionism) with acceptable model fit indices (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.